Institute for the History of Material Culture RAS
Pervobytnaia arkheologiia. Zhurnal mezhdistsiplinarnykh issledovanii
Prehistoric Archaeology. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies
Pervobytnaia arkheologiia. Zhurnal mezhdistsiplinarnykh issledovanii
Prehistoric Archaeology. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies

Vishnyatsky L. B. About the genuine author of the magical hypothesis of art origins.

Download Look on elibrary.ru

Institute for the History of Material Culture RAS, 18 Dvortsovaya emb., St. Petersburg, 191186, Russia [lvishn@yandex.ru]

Resume. The paper deals with the history of formation of the “magical hypothesis” of art origins, which replaced the “art for art’s sake” one at the turn of the last century and dominated the field till the middle 1960’s. The birth of the magical hypothesis is usually dated to 1903, when Salomon Reinach published his “L’art et la magie”. This paper exerted a tremendous influence on the minds of archaeologists and art historians, and largely predetermined the direction of research for more than half a century. However, contrary to the traditionally held view, the magical hypothesis was first formulated and substantiated not by S. Reinach but by the Russian journalist and popular science writer L. K. Popoff. In 1880 he published a book entitled “From the prehistoric life of man”. One of its chapters was devoted to the question of functions of the drawn and sculptured animal images dated to “l’age du renne”. Popoff used ethnographic evidence to suggest that these images were “inspired by belief in the existence of a material relation between a being and its image and in the possibility of acting on the first through the second”. Though he presented his ideas and arguments also in French (1890) and English (1891), his hypothesis, born before its time, went unnoticed and received no recognition. The author gives account of Popoff’s works devoted to the problem of art origins and assesses the degree of their novelty in comparison with works by E. Tylor and other West European scholars of the second half of the XIX c. Some consideration is given to the question as to whether S. Reinach had known of the hypothesis of his Russian forerunner. In addition, the paper includes a biographical essay containing little known facts of Popoff’s life.

Keywords: Paleolithic, art origins, magical hypothesis, history of science, S. Reinach, L. K. Popoff.

Received 18.10.2018.

DOI: 10.31600/2658-3925-2019-1-48-63

For citation: Vishnyatsky L. B. About the genuine author of the magical hypothesis of art origins. Prehistoric Archaeology. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies. 2019 (1), 48-63 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.31600/2658-3925-2019-1-48-63

References:

Alekseyev A. D. 1993. Literatura russkogo zarubezhʹia. Knigi  1917–1940. Materialy k bibliografii. SPb.: “Nauka” Publ. (in Russian).

Anonim. 1897. L. K. Popov (El’pe). K 25-ti-letiiu literaturnoi deiatel’nosti. Novoe vremia (illiustrirovannoe prilozhenie). SPb., subbota, 4-go (16-go) ianvaria 1897 goda. № 7491, 7 (in Russian).

Afanas’ev N. 1917. L. K. Popov (nekrolog). Novoe vremia. Pg., vtornik, 3 (16) oktiabria 1917 g., № 14887, 5 (in Russian).

Bazilevskaia N. A., Belokon’ I. P., Shcherbakova A. A. 1968. Kratkaia istoriia botaniki. M.: “Nauka” Publ. (in Russian).

Bogdanov A. (ed.-comp.). 1889. Materialy dlia istorii nauchnoi i prikladnoi deiatel’nosti v Rossii po zoologii i soprikasaiushchimsia s neiu otrasliam znaniia preimushchestvenno za poslednee tridtsatipiatiletie (1850–1888). T. 2. M.: “Tipografiia M. G. Volchaninova” Publ. (in Russian).

Broka P. 1873. Vezerskie troglodity. Priroda: populiarnyi estestvenno-istoricheskii sbornik. Kn. 2 (in Russian).

Vakulovskii N. N. 1897. L. K. Popov (El’pe). Nauchnoe obozrenie 4, 146–148 (in Russian).

Vasilʹevskii R. S. Antropomorfnye izobrazheniia i ix interpretatsiia. In: Vasilʹevskii R. S. (ed.). Antropomorfnye izobrazheniia. Novosibirsk: “Nauka” Publ. 19–27 (in Russian).

Mukhachev Iu. V. (ed.-comp.). 2006. Literaturnoe zarubezh’e Rossii: Entsiklopedicheskii spravochnik. M.: “Parad” Publ. (in Russian).

Masanov I. F. 1958. Slovar’ psevdonimov russkikh pisatelei, uchenykh i obshchestvennykh deiatelei. T. 3. M.: “Izd-vo Vsesoiuznoi knizhnoi palaty” Publ. (in Russian).

Petkova G. (comp.). 2003. Khronika literaturnoi zhizni russkogo zarubezh’ia. Bolgariia (1919–1940). Literaturovedcheskii zhurnal  17, 369–451 (in Russian).

Pilipenko O. 2011. Bіlia vitokіv molekuliarnoї bіologії. Do 130-rіchchia publіkatsіi traktatu «Osnovi molekuliarnoi bіologіi» ta 160-rіchchia vіd dnia narodzhennia iogo avtora L. K. Popova. Vіsnik Natsіonal’noi akademіi nauk Ukrainy 11, 61–71 (in Ukrainian).

Popov L. K. 1880. Iz pervobytnoi zhizni cheloveka. SPb.: “Tipografiia Ministerstva putei soobshcheniia (A. Benke) ” Publ. (in Russian).

Popov L. K. 1881. Proiskhozhdenie zhivopisi (opyt resheniia voprosa s antropologicheskoi tochki zreniia). In: Popov L. K. Populiarnye ocherki po estestvoznaniiu. SPb.: “Izdanie knizhnogo magazina A. Tsinzerlinga” Publ., 159–178 (in Russian).

Popov L. K. 1882. Obzor nauchnoi i uchebnoi literatury. Russkaia rech’ 4, 327–346 (in Russian).

Raikov B. E. 1959. Russkie biologi-evoliutsionisty do Darvina. Materialy k istorii evoliutsionnoi idei v Rossii. T. 4. M.-L.: “Izd-vo AN SSSR” Publ. (in Russian).

Reinak S. 1938 [1904]. Istoriia iskusstv («Apollon»). M.-L.: “Gosstroiizdat” Publ. (in Russian).

Uvarov A. S. 1881. Arkheologiia Rossii. I. Kamennyi period. M.: “Sinodal’naia tipografiia” Publ. (in Russian).

Filippov A. K. 2004. Khaos i garmoniia v iskusstve paleolita. SPb.: “LOOO «Sokhranenie prirody i kul’turnogo naslediia»” Publ. (in Russian).

Fomin I. I. 1912. Iskusstvo paleoliticheskogo perioda v Evrope. M.: “Pechatnia A. I. Snegirevoi” Publ. (in Russian).

Formozov A. A. 1983. Nachalo izucheniia kamennogo veka v Rossii. M.: “Nauka” Publ. (in Russian).

Formozov A. A. 1986. Stranitsy istorii russkoi arkheologii. M.: “Nauka” Publ. (in Russian).

Frolov B. A. 1971. Otkrytie i priznanie naskal‘nykh izobrazhenii lednikovoi epokhi. Istoriia odnogo kollektivnogo otkrytiia. In: Mikulinskii S. R., Iaroshevskii M. G. (eds.). Nauchnoe otkrytie i ego vospriiatie. M.: “Nauka” Publ., 194–235 (in Russian).

Shcherbakova A. A. 1961. Istoriia tsitologii rastenii v Rossii v XIX veke. M.: “Izd-vo AN SSSR” Publ. (in Russian).

Balfour H. 1893. The evolution of decorative art. New York: Macmillan and Co.

Bernardin R. J. 1876. Les archives et les monnaies préhistoriques. La Revue savoisienne, 17ème année, 11–13.

Bourgeois L., Delaunay A. 1865. Notice sur la Grotte de la Chaisse. Revue Archéologique 12, 90–94.

Conway W. M. 1891. Dawn of art in the ancient world. London: Percival and Co.

Curtis G. 2012. The cave painters: Probing the mysteries of the world’s first artists. New York: Random House.

Laming-Emperaire A. 1962. La signification de l’art rupestre Paléolithique. Méthode et applications. Paris: Editions A. et J. Picard et Cie.

Lang A. 1882. The art of savages. II. Representation. The magazine of art  5, 303–307.

Palacio-Pérez E. 2013. The origins of the concept of ‘Palaeolithic art’: theoretical roots of an idea. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 20, 682–714.

Piette E. 1873. Sur la grette de Gourdan, sur la lacune que plusieurs auteurs placent entre l’âge du renne et celui de la pierre polie, et sur l’art paléolithique dans ses rapports avec l’art gaulois. Bulletins de la Société d’anthropologie de Paris 8 (2ème série), 384–425.

Piette E. 1874. La grotte de Gourdan pendant l’âge du renne. Matériaux pour l’histoire primitive et naturelle de l’homme V (2ème série), 53–79.

Popoff L. 1890. L’origine de la peinture. Revue scientifique XLVI, 399–403.

Popoff L. 1891. The origin of painting. Popular Science Monthly 40 (November), 100–107.

Popoff L. 1894. The origin of art. Popular Science Monthly 44 (April), 827–833.

Reinach S. 1889. Antiquités nationales. Description raisonnée du Musée de SaintGermain-en-Laye. Vol. 1. Epoque des alluvions et cavernes. Paris: Firmin-Didot.

Reinach S. 1900. Phénomènes généraux du totémisme animal. Revue Scientifique 14 (4ème série), 449–57.

Reinach S. 1903a. Gustave Chauvet. Notes sur l’art primitif. Angoulème, Coquemard, 1903. Revue Archéologique 1 (4ème série), 290–91.

Reinach S. 1903b. L’art et la magie. A propos des peintures et des gravures de l’âge du Renne. L’Anthropologie 14, 257–266.

Reinach S. 1913. Repertoire de l’art Quaternaire. Paris: Ernest  Leroux.

Richard N. 1993. De l’art ludique a l’art magique. Interprétations de l’art pariétal au XIXe siècle. Bulletin de ta Socété préhistorique française 90, 60–68.

Tylor E. B. 1865. Researches into the early history of mankind and the development of civilization. London: John Murray.